We use limited cookies to make our site work, personalise content, provide social media features and analyse traffic. See our Cookie Policy for more info.
Strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
Used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a legal order, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track activity on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
The Stage
•
05 Aug 2024
Edinburgh Fringe shows should not have to rely on miracles
Comment piece
by
Lyn Gardner
“
The Stage editor Alistair Smith’s recent editorial on the State of the Arts report highlights several crucial points, not least that over the past 14 years we have not only seen a decline in funding but also that “resources have been shifted away from the grassroots and towards larger cultural organisations, often commercial ones”, and that while tax relief has been crucial to the creative industries, the big beneficiaries have been the commercial screen sector and commercial theatre sector – not the indie sector so significantly represented at the fringe and upon whose creativity and labour British theatre is built.
The State of the Arts report does not actually tell us anything we did not already know, but, goodness, it is super useful to have it all in one place, particularly as it signals so clearly the drop in prospects for the arts unless there is further investment from the new Labour government. Before anyone says: “But there is no money left” – there is. If Labour really wants to support a sector with proven wings that can genuinely contribute to helping the economy fly and attract international attention, Rachel Reeves does not need to find the missing £22 billion to do it. She can use the loose change down the back of the Treasury sofa. The investment will be repaid in so many ways.
”